Key result
A wireless vital sensor showed comparable ECG sensing performance to a Holter monitor, but required three receivers to achieve satisfactory data transmission for real-time continuous monitoring.
Why the study?
Does a wireless vital sensor provide comparable continuous ECG monitoring to a Holter monitor?
Observational (n=75)
Does a wireless vital sensor provide comparable continuous ECG monitoring to a Holter monitor?
A wireless vital sensor provides comparable ECG monitoring to a Holter monitor, provided multiple receivers are used to ensure reliable data transmission.
May enable wireless continuous ECG monitoring with multiple receivers; leaves open validation in larger trials before clinical adoption.
This paper investigates the possibility of a realtime electrocardiogram (ECG) data gathering by a wireless vital sensor in houses and hospitals. First of all, to evaluate the ECG capability, we conducted clinical tests with 67 subjects comparing 24-hour data obtained at houses between the wireless vital sensor and a Holter monitor. Secondly, to evaluate the wireless transmission capability, we conducted experiments with 8 subjects in patient rooms at a hospital. The clinical test results conclude that, as long as the sensed data are successfully received at a receiver, the wireless vital sensor has a comparable performance with the Holter ECG monitor, on the other hand, the experimental results show that the data transmission capability with a single receiver is not satisfactory for real-time continuous monitoring, but the use of three receivers can significantly improve the data transmission quality by receive diversity effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugano et al. (2010) reported an observational. Wireless vital sensor vs. Holter monitor was evaluated on ECG sensing performance and data transmission capability. A wireless vital sensor showed comparable ECG sensing performance to a Holter monitor, but required three receivers to achieve satisfactory data transmission for real-time continuous monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: