Why the study?
Does a wireless ECG sensor provide comparable performance to a standard Holter ECG monitor in clinical subjects?
Does a wireless ECG sensor provide comparable performance to a standard Holter ECG monitor in clinical subjects?
A wireless ECG sensor demonstrates comparable signal quality and performance to a standard Holter monitor, supporting its feasibility for ubiquitous healthcare monitoring.
May support wireless ECG feasibility where transmission succeeds; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
This paper introduces the concept of an online medical diagnosis system for ubiquitous health care using a wireless ECG sensor. To confirm the feasibility ofthe system, we conducted clinical tests by 67 subjects with a wireless ECG sensor and a Holter ECG monitor simultaneously for comparison purpose. We made five types of evaluations such as analyses on data loss rate, burst data loss length, ECG waveforms comparison, normalized cross-correlation and heart rate variability (HRV) by RR50. The results show that, as long as the sensed data are successfully received at a receiver, the wireless ECG sensor has a comparable performance with the Holter ECG monitor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugano et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: