Key result
A proper post-mortem diagnosis of myocardial infarction requires up-to-date knowledge of ischemic coronary and myocardial pathology and correct interpretation in relation to the clinical scenario of the deceased.
Why the study?
Post-mortem diagnosis and timing of myocardial infarction can be challenging, especially without acute coronary occlusion, necessitating up-to-date knowledge to discriminate myocardial infarction from other forms of myocardial injury.
This review provides updated guidance for pathologists on diagnosing and classifying myocardial infarction at autopsy in alignment with the 4th universal definition of myocardial infarction.
Accurate post-mortem MI diagnosis demands current pathology expertise integrated with clinical details; extends the 4th universal definition to autopsy settings.
Ischemic heart disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and death worldwide. Consequently, myocardial infarctions are often encountered in clinical and forensic autopsies, and diagnosis can be challenging, especially in the absence of an acute coronary occlusion. Precise histopathological identification and timing of myocardial infarction in humans often remains uncertain while it can be of crucial importance, especially in a forensic setting when third person involvement or medical responsibilities are in question. A proper post-mortem diagnosis requires not only up-to-date knowledge of the ischemic coronary and myocardial pathology, but also a correct interpretation of such findings in relation to the clinical scenario of the deceased. For these reasons, it is important for pathologists to be familiar with the different clinically defined types of myocardial infarction and to discriminate myocardial infarction from other forms of myocardial injury. This article reviews present knowledge and post-mortem diagnostic methods, including post-mortem imaging, to reveal the different types of myocardial injury and the clinical-pathological correlations with currently defined types of myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michaud et al. (2019) conducted a review in Myocardial infarction. Post-mortem diagnosis of myocardial infarction was evaluated. A proper post-mortem diagnosis of myocardial infarction requires up-to-date knowledge of ischemic coronary and myocardial pathology and correct interpretation in relation to the clinical scenario of the deceased.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: