PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1994The British Journal of Psychiatry160 citations

Lifetime Risk of Depression

View Full Paper
HWHans‐Ulrich WïttchenBKBärbel KnaüperRKRonald C. Kessler

Key Result

Epidemiological studies show the highest prevalence of major depression in younger cohorts (18-29 years) and an increase in cumulative lifetime estimates in successively younger birth cohorts.

Structured PICO

P
Population
General population across different age cohorts, specifically comparing younger cohorts (18-29 years) with older individuals (45 years and above, and 65 and older)
O
Outcome
Prevalence and cumulative lifetime estimates of depressive syndromes (major depression or dysthymia)

Epidemiological evidence indicates a higher prevalence of depression in younger cohorts and increasing lifetime risk in successive generations, though diagnostic challenges remain in accurately assessing depression in the elderly.

Limitations

  • Confounding factors in the elderly such as differential morbidity and response-biased memory
  • Standardised diagnostic assessment procedures may be insufficiently adapted for use in the elderly
  • Elderly individuals may suffer from clinically relevant symptoms without meeting criteria for major depression

Abstract

Over the past decade, major epidemiological studies have been conducted to determine the prevalence of depressive syndromes, primarily major depression or dysthymia. The highest prevalences occur in younger cohorts (18-29 years); considerably lower prevalences are found in older individuals (45 years and above), with the lowest in those aged 65 and older. Several studies have confirmed an increase in the cumulative lifetime estimates of major depression in successively younger birth cohorts during this century. At the same time, questions have been raised about the low prevalence of depression in the elderly, including the role of confounding factors (e.g. differential morbidity and response-biased memory). Standardised diagnostic assessment procedures may be insufficiently adapted for use in the elderly. It has also been recognised that a substantial number of elderly individuals suffer from clinically relevant symptoms of depression but do not meet the criteria for major depression. Future research will be required to elucidate fully the apparently changing rates of depression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wïttchen et al. (1994) conducted a review in Depression. Epidemiological studies show the highest prevalence of major depression in younger cohorts (18-29 years) and an increase in cumulative lifetime estimates in successively younger birth cohorts.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ffc3bc1b320180d0dbe76https://doi.org/10.1192/s0007125000293240
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper