Why the study?
Do specific reprogramming, monitoring, and scanning strategies allow safe MRI in pacemaker-dependent patients?
Observational (n=10)
Do specific reprogramming, monitoring, and scanning strategies allow safe MRI in pacemaker-dependent patients?
MRI of the head and neck appears safe in pacemaker-dependent patients when specific reprogramming, monitoring, and scanning protocols are utilized.
May support protocol-guided MRI in pacemaker-dependent patients; hypothesis-generating, requires larger prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if strategies used to safely scan nonpacemaker-dependent patients could be applied to facilitate safe MRI of pacemaker-dependent patients. INTERVENTIONS: Ten pacemaker-dependent patients underwent a total of 11 MRI scans of the head and neck. Screening, reprogramming VOO or DOO at 60 ppm, and monitoring strategies were used to facilitate MRI. A transmit-receive coil was used and MRI pulse sequences were modified to limit the whole-body specific absorption rate (SAR). RESULTS: All scans proceeded uneventfully. No difficulties in post-MRI telemetry or interrogation were seen and no post-MRI programming changes were noted. No patient experienced arrhythmia or symptoms during or immediately after MRI. Battery status remained unchanged. No patient experienced post-MRI change in sensing thresholds. Three patients showed no change in the atrial or ventricular pacing thresholds when the pre-MRI values were compared to the immediate post-MRI values and the 3-month follow-up values. All other patients showed a rise or fall of 0.5 V in their chamber threshold values when the pre-MRI, post-MRI, and 3-month follow-up values were compared. More patients showed a fall in their pacing thresholds than a rise post-MRI. CONCLUSION: While clearly a higher risk group, like nonpacemaker-dependent patients, MRI might be performed in pacemaker-dependent patients if appropriate pacemaker reprogramming, patient monitoring, and MRI scanning techniques are implemented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gimbel et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Pacemaker-dependent patients requiring MRI (n=10). MRI with specific reprogramming (VOO/DOO at 60 ppm) and monitoring strategies was evaluated on Safety (arrhythmias, symptoms, battery status, and pacing/sensing thresholds).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: