B ritish participation in the historical process of E uropean integration has been persistently framed as a policy dilemma of the highest order. This dilemma was itself coloured by the existence of policy traditions that oriented B ritain away from E urope and towards political communities tied to a historical interpretation of B ritish nationality. Euroscepticism is symptomatic of these traditions and dilemmas while at the same time sustaining them. But E urosceptics face a dilemma of their own. What serious alternative do they propose? The notion of the ‘Anglosphere’ was adopted on the E urosceptic right of B ritish politics as an alternative to E uropean integration. As a politics of disengagement by the C ameron government played out in E urope, a policy of re‐engagement began with B ritain's former Dominions. Here was a response to a political dilemma that not only used historical consciousness and political tradition as its point of departure, but as its place of destination too.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wellings et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: