Key result
Chronological age was associated with a general decrease in biomarker correlations, with 17 biomarkers (34%) showing decreased predictability and 5 (10%) showing increased predictability with age.
Why the study?
While many phenotypic biomarkers are co-dependent, how age influences their co-dependency structure is generally unknown.
Cross-Sectional (n=27,508)
Yes
The co-dependency and predictability of common phenotypic biomarkers generally decrease with advancing age, highlighting the need to consider age when interpreting biomarker relationships.
Age-adjusted biomarker interpretation may be warranted clinically; leaves open longitudinal validation and outcome prediction.
Phenotypic biomarkers (e.g. cholesterol, weight, and glucose) are important to diagnose and treat diseases associated with aging. However, while many biomarkers are co-dependent (e.g. glycohemoglobin and glucose), it is generally unknown how age influences their co-dependence. In the following, we analyzed 50 biomarkers in 27,508 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants (age range: 20 to 80, mean age: 46.3 years old, sexes: 48.9% males, 51.1% females, ethnicities: 46.0% Whites, 27.8% Hispanics, 20.0% non-Hispanic Blacks, 6.1% others) to investigate how the co-dependency structure of common biomarkers evolves with age and whether differences exist between sexes and ethnicities. First, we associated the change in correlations between biomarkers with chronological age. We identified six trends and replicated our top finding (height vs. systolic blood pressure) in participants of the UK Biobank (N=470,895). We found that, on average, correlations tend to decrease with age. Secondly, we examined how biomarkers predict other biomarkers in participants of different age groups. We found 17 (34%) biomarkers whose predictability decreases with age and 5 (10%) biomarkers whose predictability increases with age. A limitation of this study is that it cannot distinguish between biological changes related to aging and generational effects. Our results can be interactively explored here: http://apps.chiragjpgroup.org/Aging_Biomarkers_Co-Dependencies/.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goallec et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=27,508). Chronological age was evaluated on Change in correlations between biomarkers with chronological age. Chronological age was associated with a general decrease in biomarker correlations, with 17 biomarkers (34%) showing decreased predictability and 5 (10%) showing increased predictability with age.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: