Key result
Two-dimensional echocardiography reliably delineated mitral abnormalities in congenital mitral stenosis, whereas digitised M-mode was generally unreliable for assessing obstruction.
Why the study?
Does two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography reliably assess anatomical and functional severity in children with congenital mitral stenosis?
Population
Children with congenital mitral stenosis.
Comparison
Two-dimensional echocardiography and digitised… vs Cardiac catheterisation
Design
Case_series
Authors
Loading...
Caution against M-mode for obstruction severity in congenital mitral stenosis; leaves open prospective validation of 2D echocardiography.
Observational (n=10)
Does two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography reliably assess anatomical and functional severity in children with congenital mitral stenosis?
Two-dimensional echocardiography is a reliable imaging modality for delineating anatomical abnormalities in congenital mitral stenosis, whereas M-mode echocardiography is generally unreliable for assessing the severity of obstruction.
Smallhorn et al. (1981) conducted an observational in Congenital mitral stenosis (n=10). Echocardiography (Two-dimensional and digitised M-mode) was evaluated on Assessment of severity of inflow obstruction and anatomical morphology. Two-dimensional echocardiography reliably delineated mitral abnormalities in congenital mitral stenosis, whereas digitised M-mode was generally unreliable for assessing obstruction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: