Why the study?
Does the presence of extracranial carotid arterial disease predict new coronary events in elderly patients?
Does the presence of extracranial carotid arterial disease predict new coronary events in elderly patients?
The presence of extracranial carotid arterial disease is a significant predictor of new coronary events in elderly patients, independent of prior coronary artery disease.
ECD was associated with higher coronary events independent of CAD; hypothesis-generating for risk stratification, prospective studies needed.
Background A prospective study evaluated the prevalence of 40% to 100% extracranial carotid arterial disease (ECD) by carotid duplex ultrasonograms and its association with coronary artery disease (CAD) and incidence of new coronary events in 949 patients with a mean age of 82 ± 8 years. Methods Technically adequate bilateral carotid duplex ultrasonograms were obtained in 949 unselected patients, mean age 82 ± 8 years, in a chronic care facility. The prevalence of CAD and incidence of coronary events were determined in patients with and without ECD. Follow-up was 45 ± 22 months. Data were analyzed by chi-square analyses. Results CAD was present in 87 of 150 patients (58%) with ECD and in 314 of 799 patients (39%) without ECD (P < 0.001). Coronary events occurred in 70 of 87 patients (80%) with ECD and CAD (group A), in 188 of 314 patients (60%) with CAD and no ECD (group B), in 28 of 63 patients (44%) with ECD and no CAD (group C), and in 133 of 485 patients (27%) with no ECD and no CAD (group D). Significant P values were P < 0.001 comparing A with B, A with C, A with D, and B with D; P < 0.01 comparing C with D; and P < 0.025 comparing B with C. Conclusions Patients with ECD have a higher prevalence of CAD and a higher incidence of coronary events than patients without ECD. Patients with CAD and ECD have a higher incidence of coronary events than patients with CAD and no ECD. Patients with ECD and no CAD have a higher incidence of coronary events than patients with no ECD and no CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aronow et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: