Key result
Sapovirus infection in renal transplant recipients shows similar clinical outcomes to other acute gastroenteritis causes.
Why the study?
Following an observed increase in sapovirus diagnoses among kidney transplant recipients, the study was initiated to better understand sapovirus infection characteristics in this high-risk group.
Does sapovirus infection cause worse clinical outcomes compared to other GI pathogens in renal transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=13)
No
Does sapovirus infection cause worse clinical outcomes compared to other GI pathogens in renal transplant recipients?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.3% vs 2.5%
p-value: p=0.710
Sapovirus infection in renal transplant recipients presents similarly to other viral GI pathogens, with a trend toward higher admission creatinine and tacrolimus levels, but patients recover equally well with symptomatic treatment.
Similar outcomes support symptomatic care for sapovirus gastroenteritis in renal transplant recipients; leaves open subtle renal effects for prospective study.
Purpose After including sapovirus to the viral GI-screening routine of our institution's laboratory, we noticed an increasing number of sapovirus diagnosis among kidney transplant recipients. Therefore, we assumed former GI-tract infections with unidentified pathogens could have been caused by sapovirus as well. In order to better understand the characteristics of a sapovirus infection in a high-risk group we initiated this study. Methods 13 renal transplant recipients with GI-tract symptoms and later identified viral/unknown pathogens were included. Four patients suffered from a sapovirus infection. Kidney function, levels of immunosuppressants, CRP-levels and acid-base balance at admission and dismission, as well as onset of symptoms and time of hospitalization were analyzed. Results Even though statistically not significant, creatinine levels at admission tended to be higher in sapovirus patients (p = 0,710, sapovirus: 3,3 mg/dl (1,3; 5,0), non-sapovirus: 2,5 mg/dl (1,1; 4,9)). Also, Tacrolimus levels at admission showed the same trend (sapovirus: 13,6 ng/ml (12,9; 13,6), non-sapovirus: 7 ng/ml (2,6; 22,6), p = 0,279). At dismission creatinine levels improved equally in both groups (sapovirus: 1,7 mg/dl (1,4; 3,2), non-sapovirus: 2 mg/dl (1,0; 3,6), p = 0,825). Conclusion Especially in high-risk patients early symptomatic treatment remains crucial to protect the transplant's function. In our cohort all patients recovered equally well from the sapovirus infection as well as from other viral GI-tract pathogens. Larger cohorts and long-time follow-ups are needed in order to detect the long-term consequences and a potential need for further research regarding specific treatment. Trial registration number: DRKS00033311 date : December 28th 2023
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rippl et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute gastroenteritis (n=13). Sapovirus infection vs. Non-sapovirus acute gastroenteritis was evaluated on Creatinine levels at admission (mg/dl) (p=0.710). Sapovirus infection in renal transplant recipients resulted in similar clinical outcomes and recovery compared to other causes of acute gastroenteritis, with a non-significant trend toward higher admission creatinine and tacrolimus levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: