Key result
Short-term HRV markers are linked to LVEF recovery in HFrEF with moderate diagnostic accuracy.
Why the study?
Studies evaluating the optimal ECG recording time to indicate HFrecEF using short-term HRV were lacking.
Do short-term heart rate variability metrics indicate functional ejection fraction recovery in patients with HFrEF?
Cross-Sectional (n=194)
No
Do short-term heart rate variability metrics indicate functional ejection fraction recovery in patients with HFrEF?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.718 (95% CI 0.608-0.829)
p-value: p=<0.001
Short-term HRV metrics may associate with EF recovery in HFrEF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background: Recently, reduced sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity measured by 10-minute electrocardiogram (ECG)-based heart rate (HR) variability (HRV) was associated with heart failure (HF) with recovered ejection fraction (EF) (HFrecEF). However, there are no studies on the optimal ECG recording time to indicate HFrecEF in short-term HRV. Objective: In this study, the optimal ECG intervals and time-domain metrics to elucidate indicators for HFrecEF were investigated in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). Methods: HRV analyses based on 2-, 4.5-, and 9-minute ECG intervals were performed in 4 groups: patients with persistent HFrEF (n = 40), HFrecEF (n = 41), and stage A HF (n = 73) and healthy controls (n = 40). Results: < .05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the SNS index at a 9-minute ECG interval had the highest area under the curve, followed by the triangular index at a 2-minute ECG interval for the recovered EF group (0.724 and 0.718, respectively). Conclusion: In this study, a higher 2-minute triangular index and a lower 9-minute SNS index indicated functional EF recovery in HFrEF. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the utility of short-term indexes to predict myocardial recovery after HF treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagai et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=194). Short-term heart rate variability metrics (2-minute triangular index and 9-minute SNS index) vs. Persistent HFrEF vs HFrecEF vs Stage A HF vs Healthy controls was evaluated on Identification of HFrecEF by 2-minute triangular index (AUC 0.718, 95% CI 0.608-0.829, p=<0.001). A higher 2-minute triangular index and a lower 9-minute SNS index indicated functional ejection fraction recovery in patients with HFrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: