Key result
The reduction in myocardial oxygen consumption per beat accompanying a decline in LV end-diastolic volume was significantly smaller at high inotropy than at low inotropy (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does reduction in LV end-diastolic volume alter myocardial oxygen consumption differently at high versus low inotropy in anaesthetized pigs?
Does reduction in LV end-diastolic volume alter myocardial oxygen consumption differently at high versus low inotropy in anaesthetized pigs?
p-value: p=< 0.05
The reduction in myocardial oxygen consumption accompanying a decline in LV end-diastolic volume is greater at low inotropy than at high inotropy, associated with changes in contractility independent of beta-adrenergic stimulation.
Preclinical finding only; leaves open whether inotropy modulates preload effects on myocardial oxygen consumption in patients.
Variations in left ventricular (LV) wall tension during changes in LV end‐diastolic volume significantly affect myocardial oxygen consumption (M V O 2 ). In the present study we examined if the reduction in M V O 2 ) per beat accompanying a decline in LV end‐diastolic volume at constant LV systolic pressure (LVSP) is dependent on the level of myocardial inotropy. In six anaesthetized open‐chest pigs, the blood volume was expanded by i. v. infusion of a Ringer solution. At constant heart rate (by atrial pacing) and LVSP (by adjustments of a proximal aortic snare), LV end‐diastolic volume was reduced in steps by withdrawals of blood. This procedure was performed at high inotropy (during a continuous intracoronary infusion of isoproterenol, 0.40 ± 0.08 μg min ‐1 ), and at low inotropy (after i. v. injection of 3.4 ± 0.2 mg propranolol). LVSP was about 25 mmHg higher at high than at low inotropy. The fall in LV tension was therefore greater during blood volume reductions at high than at low inotropy because the fall in LV end‐diastolic volume was almost identical and was initiated from the same level at both high and low inotropy. Nevertheless, the slope of the M V O 2 /LV end‐diastolic volume relationship was significantly ( P < 0.05) less steep at high (1.26 ± 0.30 μmol 100 g ‐1 mm ‐1 ) than at low inotropy (2.06 ± 0.48 μmol 100 g ‐1 mm ‐1 ). M V O 2 per beat fell by only 0.79 ± 0.17 μmol 100 g ‐1 (from 6.03 ± 0–4±5 μmol 100 g ‐1 = 13.8 ± 3.1%) at high inotropy compared with 1.21 ± 0.19 μmol 100 g ‐1 (from 3.79 ± 0.29 μmmol 100 g ‐1 = 30.5 ± 3.4%) at low inotropy. The greater reduction in M V O 2 per beat at low inotropy was associated with a reduction in LVd P /d t of 24 ± 4%, whereas LVd P /d t remained unchanged at high inotropy. Thus, the changes in M V O 2 per beat and LVd P /d t were closely correlated ( r = 0.94), and because the reduction in contractility was present only after propranolol administration it appeared to be induced by mechanisms other than variations in β‐adrenergic stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ANDERSEN et al. (1990) studied this question. Reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume at high inotropy vs. Reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume at low inotropy (propranolol 3.4 ± 0.2 mg) was evaluated on Slope of the myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) / LV end-diastolic volume relationship (p=< 0.05). The reduction in myocardial oxygen consumption per beat accompanying a decline in LV end-diastolic volume was significantly smaller at high inotropy than at low inotropy (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: