Why the study?
Does high admission glucose increase the risk of early and late mortality in non-diabetic patients with STEMI?
Meta-Analysis
Does high admission glucose increase the risk of early and late mortality in non-diabetic patients with STEMI?
High admission glucose is a significant prognostic marker for increased early and late mortality in non-diabetic patients presenting with STEMI.
May identify high-risk non-diabetic STEMI patients; leaves open whether glucose-targeted intervention improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Impaired admission glucose (AG) is considered to significantly increase risk on both early and late death of the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), especially for non-diabetic patients; however, some reports contradict the relationship. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to clarify this issue. MATERIAL/METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify all related prospective cohort studies. The relative risks (RR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled quantitatively. RESULTS: The pooled RR of early outcome events indicated patients with glucose concentrations ≥6.1-11.1 mmol/L had a 4.38-fold (95% CI, 3.23-5.94) higher early mortality. The pooled RR of late outcome events indicated that the patients with glucose concentrations ≥7.8-11.1 mmol/L had a 1.65-fold (95% CI, 1.33-2.04) higher late mortality based on in-hospital or 30-day survivors. CONCLUSIONS: High AG may be a helpful prognostic marker of significantly increased risk on early death in non-diabetic patients with STEMI, and has an explicit but prognostic adverse impact on long-term mortality but not early mortality in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang Liu (2015) conducted a meta-analysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in non-diabetic patients. High admission glucose (≥6.1-11.1 mmol/L) vs. Low admission glucose was evaluated on Early mortality (<30 days after admission) (RR 4.38, 95% CI 3.23-5.94).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: