Key result
Outpatient rivaroxaban for DVT shows no difference in outcomes versus historical inpatient controls.
Why the study?
Despite guideline recommendations to treat deep vein thrombosis in outpatient settings, inpatient therapy remains prevalent, leading to unwarranted healthcare resource utilization.
Does outpatient treatment with oral rivaroxaban improve or maintain safety and efficacy in patients with deep vein thrombosis without pulmonary embolism compared to inpatient treatment?
Cohort (n=209)
Does outpatient treatment with oral rivaroxaban improve or maintain safety and efficacy in patients with deep vein thrombosis without pulmonary embolism compared to inpatient treatment?
Outpatient treatment of deep vein thrombosis with oral rivaroxaban is safe and effective, yielding outcomes comparable to traditional inpatient therapy.
Supports outpatient rivaroxaban feasibility for DVT; hypothesis-generating and leaves randomized confirmation open.
BACKGROUND: Despite the guidelines' appeal to treat patients with deep vein thrombosis and low-risk pulmonary embolism in outpatient settings, the real-world evidence shows a high prevalence of inpatient therapy leading to unwarranted health resource utilization. The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in outpatient settings compared to inpatient treatment. METHODS: A propensity score-matched comparison with a historical inpatient population was performed based on a retrospective analysis of patients with deep vein thrombosis and without pulmonary embolism treated as outpatients with oral rivaroxaban. Inpatient controls were treated with oral rivaroxaban following a short-term initial therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins. The relevant outcomes extracted from electronic medical records were as follows: recurrent deep vein thrombosis and symptomatic pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, minor bleeding, unscheduled hospitalization, and death. RESULTS: Among 209 outpatients who were never admitted to the hospital the deep vein thrombosis recurrence rate was 3.3% (95%CI, 1.6-6.8%), clinically relevant non-major bleeding rate 2.9% (95%CI, 1.3-6.1), minor bleeding rate 6.2% (95%CI, 3.7-10.0%), unscheduled hospitalization rate 1.4% (95%CI, 0.5- 4.1%), mortality rate 1.4% (95%CI, 0.5-4.1%). No symptomatic pulmonary embolism or major bleeding was detected. No statistically significant differences were observed when compared with inpatient controls. CONCLUSIONS: The outpatient use of rivaroxaban for deep vein thrombosis treatment is a safe and effective approach for patients without pulmonary embolism, with no significant differences when compared to inpatient therapy with oral rivaroxaban following a short-term initial therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schastlivtsev et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Deep vein thrombosis (n=209). Oral rivaroxaban (outpatient) vs. Inpatient therapy with oral rivaroxaban following short-term low-molecular-weight heparins was evaluated on Recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Outpatient treatment with oral rivaroxaban for deep vein thrombosis yielded a 3.3% recurrence rate, with no significant differences in outcomes compared to historical inpatient controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: