Key result
Rivaroxaban was noninferior to standard therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (HR 0.89, p<0.001 for noninferiority) and significantly reduced the rate of major bleeding.
Why the study?
Does rivaroxaban reduce symptomatic recurrent VTE in patients with symptomatic DVT and/or PE compared to standard therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=8,282)
Open-label
Randomized
Yes
Does rivaroxaban reduce symptomatic recurrent VTE in patients with symptomatic DVT and/or PE compared to standard therapy?
A single-drug approach with rivaroxaban is noninferior to standard therapy for treating symptomatic VTE and significantly reduces the risk of major bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports rivaroxaban monotherapy for acute VTE; confirms and extends RCT noninferiority with lower major bleeding in pooled data.
BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) consists of a heparin combined with vitamin K antagonists. Direct oral anticoagulants have been investigated for acute and extended treatment of symptomatic VTE; their use could avoid parenteral treatment and/or laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant effects. METHODS: A prespecified pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE studies compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban (15 mg twice-daily for 21 days, followed by 20 mg once-daily) with standard-therapy (enoxaparin 1.0 mg/kg twice-daily and warfarin or acenocoumarol). Patients were treated for 3, 6, or 12 months and followed for suspected recurrent VTE and bleeding. The prespecified noninferiority margin was 1.75. RESULTS: A total of 8282 patients were enrolled; 4151 received rivaroxaban and 4131 received standard-therapy. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 86 (2.1%) rivaroxaban-treated patients compared with 95 (2.3%) standard-therapy-treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.19; pnoninferiority < 0.001). Major bleeding was observed in 40 (1.0%) and 72 (1.7%) patients in the rivaroxaban and standard-therapy groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.79; p = 0.002). In key subgroups, including fragile patients, cancer patients, patients presenting with large clots, and those with a history of recurrent VTE, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban were similar compared with standard-therapy. CONCLUSION: The single-drug approach with rivaroxaban resulted in similar efficacy to standard-therapy and was associated with a significantly lower rate of major bleeding. Efficacy and safety results were consistent among key patient subgroups. TRIAL REGISTRATION EINSTEIN-PE: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00439777; EINSTEIN-DVT: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00440193.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prins et al. (2013) conducted a meta-analysis in Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (n=8,282). Rivaroxaban vs. Standard-therapy (enoxaparin and warfarin or acenocoumarol) was evaluated on Symptomatic recurrent VTE (composite of fatal or nonfatal PE or DVT) (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66-1.19, p=<0.001 for noninferiority). Rivaroxaban was noninferior to standard therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (HR 0.89, p<0.001 for noninferiority) and significantly reduced the rate of major bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: