Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study deviations by a group of agents in the three main types of matching markets: the house allocation, the marriage, and the roommates models. For a given instance, we call a matching k-stable if no other matching exists that is more beneficial to at least k out of the n agents. The concept generalizes the recently studied majority stability [ 57 ]. We prove that whereas the verification of k -stability for a given matching is polynomial-time solvable in all three models, the complexity of deciding whether a k -stable matching exists depends on \(k/n\) and is characteristic of each model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aziz et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: