Key result
Cryo-EM of rabbit RyR1 under partially inactivating Ca2+ conditions revealed open and closed-inactivated conformations, illustrating the structural basis for Ca2+-dependent channel inactivation.
The study provides structural insights into the Ca2+ inactivation mechanism of the mammalian ryanodine receptor type 1, illustrating how prior Ca2+ activation is a prerequisite for inactivation.
Does not yet inform clinical management of RyR-related disorders; extends structural understanding of Ca2+-dependent inactivation.
Activation of the intracellular Ca 2+ channel ryanodine receptor (RyR) triggers a cytosolic Ca 2+ surge, while elevated cytosolic Ca 2+ inhibits the channel in a negative feedback mechanism. Cryogenic electron microscopy of rabbit RyR1 embedded in nanodiscs under partially inactivating Ca 2+ conditions revealed an open and a closed-inactivated conformation. Ca 2+ binding to the high-affinity site engages the central and C-terminal domains into a block, which pries the S6 four-helix bundle open. Further rotation of this block pushes S6 toward the central axis, closing (inactivating) the channel. Main characteristics of the Ca 2+ -inactivated conformation are downward conformation of the cytoplasmic assembly and tightly knit subunit interface contributed by a fully occupied Ca 2+ activation site, two inter-subunit resolved lipids, and two salt bridges between the EF hand domain and the S2–S3 loop validated by disease-causing mutations. The structural insight illustrates the prior Ca 2+ activation prerequisite for Ca 2+ inactivation and provides for a seamless transition from inactivated to closed conformations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nayak et al. (2022) studied this question. Ca2+ inactivation conditions was evaluated on Structural conformation of RyR1. Cryo-EM of rabbit RyR1 under partially inactivating Ca2+ conditions revealed open and closed-inactivated conformations, illustrating the structural basis for Ca2+-dependent channel inactivation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: