Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study assesses impediments to lines of communication recurrently found to be operational in design juries, i.e. student to juror, juror to student, juror to juror. Unfortunately, discourse within design juries can be easily blocked or distorted, and can become one-sided and one-way in nature. The following is a brief description of elements in this dialogue that can and often do go awry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Paul Frederickson (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: