Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The emphasis of this analysis is on the social institutional history of medical sociology. This subfield is described as (1) closely connected with the patterns of development in its current discipline, (2) as containing a dual thrust between applied and basic science, and (3) as struggling with insider-outsider ambiguity involving the work of subgroups working either in medicine or from roles external to medicine but studying the sociology of medicine. Tracing a detailed historical fragment from the decade following World War II, it is predicted that the continuity of an accepted position for medical sociology is assured even though the style and quality of its professional life are full of uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuel W. Bloom (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: