Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved hate speech detection using machine learning classifiers, indicating enhanced accuracy.
Objectives: To develop an improved hate speech detection method based on word embedding and linguistic features. Methods: Many machine-learning classifiers like Logistic Regression (LR), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Linear Support Vector Classifier (SVC) are trained on linguistic data for identifying hated speech. For this research two datasets has been used with the size of 24783 tweets and 6977 tweets for Tweet hate speech detection dataset and Hasoc19 dataset respectively. We have taken the size of training and testing dataset is 67/33 for both the dataset, in which size of training dataset is 67 and size of testing dataset is 33. Findings: On Tweet hate speech detection dataset we target the highest accuracy 0.90 and highest precision, recall and f1-score like 0.87, 0.85 and 0.90 respectively for label 0 and 0.98, 0.98 and 0.93 respectively for label 1 and 0.86, 0.85 and 0.74 for class 2 after applying random forest classifier. On Hasoc2019 dataset we achieve the highest accuracy 0.99 and highest precision, recall and f1-score values like 1.00, 0.99 and 1.00 for class 0 and 1.0, 0.99 and 0.99 for class 1 after applying Random Forest classifier with linguistic features TF-IDF word embedding technique. Novelty: Twenty linguistic features with term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) word embedding technique make this research unique. Twenty linguistic characteristics have been chosen for detecting the despised information based on three groups of attributes which is complexity attributes, stylometric attributes and psycho-linguistic attributes have been chosen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jain et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: