Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework assesses multicultural claims in cultural minority groups, revealing important differences in recognition.
The emergence of multicultural theory and of claims of recognition by cultural, ethnic, and national minorities has brought to the forefront previously neglected aspects of the right to equality. However, when judged on their own, claims for recognition stand the risk of failing to fully capture, and even distorting, the meaning of equality. I suggest that in order to avoid this risk, multicultural claims need to be contextualized. Employing Nancy Frasers framework of two dimensions of justicerecognition and redistributionand adding a third dimensionpolitical participation, I suggest a framework for a contextualized assessment of multicultural claims that allows us to properly and fully assess their validity. I then go on to employ this framework on the claims of Israels two most significant cultural minoritiesthe Palestinian Arabs and the Ultra Orthodox Jews. I show how the use of the suggested framework helps to expose the considerable differences between these two cultural minorities, and consequently the notable difference in the merits of their claims, a difference that would have otherwise gone undetected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gila Stopler (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: