A complete frequency response analysis of the Doherty amplifier is presented with the conventional output combining network consisting of two quarter-wavelength <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">(λ /4)</tex></formula> transmission lines at a center frequency <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">f₀</tex> </formula> . Expressions for output power and efficiency were derived over the whole dynamic range and at any frequency <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex Notation="TeX">f</tex></formula> . The analysis shows that the amount of efficiency enhancement, as well as the maximum output power, reduce as the deviation from <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">f₀</tex> </formula> increases. For instance, the derived expressions show that a conventional Doherty amplifier has a drain efficiency of <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex Notation="TeX">η ≥ 52.7%</tex></formula> , which represents at least 13.4% efficiency enhancement over a class B amplifier, and up to 33.3% fractional bandwidth. A modified output combining network, using <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">λ /4</tex></formula> lines with reduced impedance transformation ratio, is also analyzed, which results in a bandwidth extension of the Doherty amplifier when compared to the conventional design. To verify the derived analyses, three unsymmetrical GaN Doherty power amplifiers (DPAs) were designed and characterized; the first DPA was based on the conventional output combining network, while the second DPA was based on the proposed network. Measurements showed that the first DPA had, at 5–6-dB back-off, a drain efficiency of <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">η ≥ 44%</tex></formula> and over 28% fractional bandwidth (1.7–2.25 GHz), while the DPA with the proposed output combining network had a better wideband performance than the third reference conventional DPA, with a back-off drain efficiency of <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">η ≥ 41%</tex></formula> , and over 42% fractional bandwidth (1.7–2.6 GHz). To the best of authors' knowledge, the designed DPAs have the highest bandwidths reported thus far.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bathich et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: