Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines self-efficacy differences in physical educators teaching students with disabilities, suggesting broader implications for instructional strategies.
Purpose : This study examined the differences in physical educators’ self-efficacy to teach students with disabilities across integrated and self-contained classes and the association between efficacy-relevant information on their beliefs in their capabilities to teach across each placement. Method : Physical education (PE) teachers ( n = 170) completed the Self-Efficacy to Teach Students with Disabilities Across Instructional Placements for Physical Education scale and a demographic questionnaire. Differences in self-efficacy between placements were tested using analyses of covariance, and associations between self-efficacy variables were explored via structural equation modeling. Results : No significant differences in PE teachers’ self-efficacy were found among teachers with experience teaching students with disabilities in only an integrated placement compared with a self-contained placement. However, those with experience teaching in both placements reported a significantly higher self-efficacy to teach in a self-contained placement. Favorable efficacy-relevant information directly predicted teachers’ self-efficacy in both placements and served as a mediator in the indirect relationship between unfavorable efficacy-relevant information and PE teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. Discussion/Conclusion : Further research may explore diverse methodologies to connect the impact of efficacy-relevant information on PE teachers’ self-efficacy across instructional placements, enhancing our understanding of its consistency across instructional settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nowland et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: