Urban landscapes cannot be understood solely by material or symbolic criteria, but only by a close examination of their various interlinkages. The production of ideological meanings concerning a city's identity, development, and future trajectory are both constitutive and reflective of material processes and desires. In this paper, I examine the economic and political context in which a vision of one city's future identity was promoted. I argue that a 1990 newspaper series concerning the future of Vancouver, British Columbia, can be read as an important thread within a broader tapestry of hegemonic formation—a formation profoundly interlinked with the entrenchment of a neo-liberal agenda in Canada. I also suggest that this effort to shape a hegemonic vision of the city's future draws on and helps to transform broader, common-sense understandings of Canadian democracy and of the role of citizens within a liberal welfare state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katharyne Mitchell (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: