Key result
Contingency change, such as unpredictably gained or lost control, elicited a more negative postimperative negative variation than continual helplessness or predictable lack of control.
Contingency change is a crucial cognitive determinant of the postimperative negative variation (PINV).
Contingency change may heighten PINV negativity; leaves open its role as a determinant in helplessness models.
This study examined cognitive determinants of the postimperative negative variation (PINV), a slow brain potential observable after the onset of an imperative stimulus in a forewarned reaction time task. Controllability of the aversive imperative stimulus by a motor reaction and predictability of the contingency were varied in a factorial design. The exogenous portion of the slow negative wave was assessed in a passive listening condition using tones of the same quality as the imperative stimuli, but presented without forewarning. Results show that PINV not only occurs when control is absent but also during unpredictably gained control. Similarly, unpredictable lack of control yields a more negative potential than continual helplessness. Negativity elicited by the aversive tone alone was not significantly different from PINV during predictable lack of control. The order of conditions, which was manipulated between groups, did not affect amplitudes. It was concluded that contingency change is a crucial cognitive determinant of the PINV, whereas the effect of lack of control is difficult to differentiate from the sensory influence of the acoustic stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kathmann et al. (1990) studied this question. Controllability and predictability of an aversive imperative stimulus vs. Continual helplessness or predictable lack of control was evaluated on Postimperative negative variation (PINV) amplitude. Contingency change, such as unpredictably gained or lost control, elicited a more negative postimperative negative variation than continual helplessness or predictable lack of control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: