Key result
Implementation of a Surgical Safety Checklist achieved 94% participation at 1 year, with high completion scores (84.5%) but poor accuracy (54.1%).
Why the study?
What is the objective compliance (accuracy and completion) of the Surgical Safety Checklist after implementation?
Observational (n=671)
No
What is the objective compliance (accuracy and completion) of the Surgical Safety Checklist after implementation?
Although implementation of a Surgical Safety Checklist achieves high participation and completion rates, accuracy remains poor, highlighting a barrier to effective use.
High completion masks poor accuracy; leaves open whether targeted interventions can improve checklist fidelity in surgical practice.
BACKGROUND: The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has been introduced as an effective tool for reducing perioperative mortality and complications. Although reported completion rates are high, objective compliance is not well defined. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine SSC compliance as measured by accuracy and completion, and factors that can affect compliance. STUDY DESIGN: In September 2010, our institution implemented an adaptation of the World Health Organization's SSC in an effort to improve patient safety and outcomes. A tool was developed for objective evaluation of overall compliance (maximum score 40) that was an aggregate score of completion and accuracy (20 each). Random samples of SSCs were analyzed at specific, predefined, time points throughout the first year after implementation. Procedure start time, operative time, and case complexity were assessed to determine association with compliance. RESULTS: A total of 671 SSCs were analyzed. The participation rate improved from 33% (95 of 285) at week 1 to 94% (249 of 265) at 1 year (p < 0.0001, chi-square test). Mean overall compliance score was 27.7 (± 5.4 SD) of 40 possible points (69.3% ± 13.5% of total possible score; n = 671) and did not change over time. Although completion scores were high (16.9 ± 2.7 out of 20 [84.5% ± 13.6%]), accuracy was poor (10.8 ± 3.4 out of 20 [54.1% ± 16.9%]). Overall compliance score was significantly associated with case start-time (p < 0.05), and operative time and case complexity showed no association. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that although implementation of an SSC results in a high level of overall participation and completion, accuracy remained poor. Identification of barriers to effective use is needed, as improper checklist use can adversely affect patient safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sparks et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Surgical procedures (n=671). Surgical Safety Checklist was evaluated on Overall compliance score (completion and accuracy). Implementation of a Surgical Safety Checklist achieved 94% participation at 1 year, with high completion scores (84.5%) but poor accuracy (54.1%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: