This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the 4 scales of the Behavioral Health Questionnaire-20 (BHQ-20): Global Mental Health, Well-Being, Symptoms, and Life Functioning. Four samples were used: community adults, college students, college students in counseling, and adults in outpatient psychotherapy. Support was found for internal consistency and 2-week test-retest reliability. For construct validity, the BHQ-20 scales distinguished levels of pathology among the samples and were sensitive to improvement across 3 psychotherapy sessions. Concurrent validity correlations with the scales of established measures were at least moderately high. Higher correlations were also found between the BHQ-20 scales and the nonanalogous scales of the established measures. These results, along with high correlations among the BHQ-20 scales, indicated the presence of 1 primary mental health dimension accounting for the variance. The BHQ-20 was proven to be a generally reliable, valid questionnaire that is distinguished by the efficiency with which it assesses mental health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kopta et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: