Key result
DOAC refills occur ~18 days early on average, correlating strongly with medication possession ratio.
Why the study?
Common adherence measures like the medication possession ratio average supplies over arbitrary periods, masking the variability of refill behavior over time.
Does the ΔT metric accurately characterize dynamic medication adherence behavior over time in patients on DOACs?
Cohort (n=116)
Yes
Does the ΔT metric accurately characterize dynamic medication adherence behavior over time in patients on DOACs?
Effect estimate: r=0.778 (correlation between MPR and mean ΔT)
p-value: p=0.001
The ΔT index provides a robust, single-interval measure that reveals the dynamic, temporal nature of patient refill behaviors (including hazardous gaps) often masked by aggregate adherence metrics like MPR.
ΔT detects early DOAC refills despite high MPR; leaves open its value for adherence monitoring or outcomes pending validation.
INTRODUCTION: Calculating patients' medication availability from dispensing or refill data is a common method to estimate adherence. The most often used measures, such as the medication possession ratio (MPR), average medication supplies over an arbitrary period. Averaging masks the variability of refill behavior over time. GOAL: To derive a new absolute adherence estimate from dispensing data. METHOD: Dispensing histories of patients with 19 refills of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2017 were extracted from 39 community pharmacies in Switzerland. The difference between the calculated and effective refill day (ΔT) was determined for each refill event. We graphed ΔT and its dichotomized version (dΔT) against the MPR, calculated mean ΔT and mean dΔT per refill, and applied cluster analysis. RESULTS: We characterized 2204 refill events from 116 DOAC patients. MPR was high (0.975 ± 0.129) and showed a positive correlation with mean ΔT. Refills occurred on average 17.8 ± 27.9 days "too early", with a mean of 75.8 ± 20.2 refills being "on time". Four refill behavior patterns were identified including constant gaps within or at the end of the observation period, which were critical. CONCLUSION: We introduce a new absolute adherence estimate ΔT that characterizes every refill event and shows that the refill behavior of DOAC patients is dynamic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baumgartner et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Patients requiring direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) (n=116). DOAC dispensing history and refill behavior was evaluated on Mean difference between calculated and effective refill day (ΔT) and correlation with MPR (r=0.778 (correlation between MPR and mean ΔT), p=0.001). DOAC refills occurred on average 17.8 days too early, and mean ΔT showed a positive correlation (r=0.778, p=0.001) with the medication possession ratio (MPR), characterizing dynamic patient refill behavior over time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: