Why the study?
The study aimed to examine the coronary volume to left ventricular mass ratio derived from CCTA in patients with diabetes.
Does diabetes mellitus affect the coronary volume to left ventricular mass (V/M) ratio in patients with suspected CAD?
Does diabetes mellitus affect the coronary volume to left ventricular mass (V/M) ratio in patients with suspected CAD?
Patients with diabetes have a significantly lower coronary volume to left ventricular mass ratio on CCTA compared to non-diabetics, suggesting a physiological imbalance between coronary vasculature and myocardial mass.
Diabetes-associated lower V/M ratio on CCTA may signal mismatch; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective outcome validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) and may provoke structural and functional changes in coronary vasculature. The coronary volume to left ventricular mass (V/M) ratio is a new anatomical parameter capable of revealing a potential physiological imbalance between coronary vasculature and myocardial mass. The aim of this study was to examine the V/M derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with diabetes. METHODS: Patients with clinically suspected CAD enrolled in the ADVANCE (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care) registry and known diabetic status were included. Coronary artery volume and left ventricular myocardial mass were analyzed from CCTA and the V/M ratio was calculated and compared between patients with and without diabetes. RESULTS: /g, respectively, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The V/M ratio was significantly lower in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetics, even after correcting for obstructive coronary stenosis. The clinical value of the reduced V/M ratio in diabetic patients needs further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuneman et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: