Key result
Artificial intelligence offers significant potential in pediatric cardiology for disease phenotyping, morbidity prediction, and tailored surgical plans, despite current barriers to implementation.
Why the study?
Pediatric cardiology requires a complex decision-making model combining perceptual and cognitive demands, making artificial intelligence an attractive technology with great potential.
This review provides an overview of artificial intelligence applications, history, and implementation barriers in pediatric cardiology.
The combination of pediatric cardiology being both a perceptual and a cognitive subspecialty demands a complex decision-making model which makes artificial intelligence a particularly attractive technology with great potential. The prototypical artificial intelligence system would autonomously impute patient data into a collaborative database that stores, syncs, interprets and ultimately classifies the patient's profile to specific disease phenotypes to compare against a large aggregate of shared peer health data and outcomes, the current medical body of literature and ongoing trials to offer morbidity and mortality prediction, drug therapy options targeted to each patient's genetic profile, tailored surgical plans and recommendations for timing of sequential imaging. The focus of this review paper is to offer a primer on artificial intelligence and paediatric cardiology by briefly discussing the history of artificial intelligence in medicine, modern and future applications in adult and paediatric cardiology across selected concentrations, and current barriers to implementation of these technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gearhart et al. (2020) conducted a review in Pediatric cardiology. Artificial intelligence was evaluated. Artificial intelligence offers significant potential in pediatric cardiology for disease phenotyping, morbidity prediction, and tailored surgical plans, despite current barriers to implementation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: