Why the study?
Does a major safety intervention reduce human factors and adverse events in pediatric cardiac surgery?
Does a major safety intervention reduce human factors and adverse events in pediatric cardiac surgery?
Systematic and periodic assessment of observers is required when evaluating teamwork and human factors in complex settings like the pediatric cardiac surgery operating room.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mandates periodic observer reliability checks in dynamic OR settings; leaves open safety intervention efficacy in pediatric cardiac surgery.
Motivation – Our study is designed to identify human factors that are a threat to the safety of children with heart disease. Research approach – After an initial observation period, we will apply a major safety intervention. We will then re-measure the occurrence and types of human factors in the operating room, and the incidence of adverse events, near misses and hospital death, to evaluate if there was a significant post-intervention reduction. Findings/design – We focus on challenges encountered during the training of the observers. Research Limitations – Because of the complexity of the OR, observations are necessarily subjective. Originality/Value – This work is original because of the systematic evaluation of a safety intevention and the training protocol for the observers. Take Away Message – Systematic and periodic assessment of observers is required when teamwork is observed in complex, dynamic settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schraagen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: