Key result
A pre-activity movement control exercise programme reduced overall match injury incidence by 15% compared with a standardised programme in youth rugby players (RR 0.85; 90% CI 0.61-1.17).
Why the study?
Does a pre-activity movement control exercise programme reduce time-loss injuries in youth rugby players compared to a standardised exercise programme?
RCT (n=2,452)
Single-blind
Cluster-randomized
Yes
Does a pre-activity movement control exercise programme reduce time-loss injuries in youth rugby players compared to a standardised exercise programme?
Relative Risk: 0.85 (95% CI 0.61–1.17)
Absolute Event Rate: 17.6% vs 18.5%
A pre-activity movement control exercise programme completed 2-3 times per week may reduce overall match injury and concussion incidence in youth rugby players.
May support pre-activity movement control exercises in youth rugby; extends prior prevention trials but needs larger studies to confirm benefit.
Background Structured pre-activity exercise programmes have demonstrated injury prevention in a variety of settings, but their efficacy is largely unknown in contact-orientated sports. Objective To assess the efficacy of a pre-activity movement control exercise programme to reduce injury risk in youth rugby when compared with a standardised exercise programme. Design Single-blind cluster-randomised controlled trial. Setting Independent schools within England during the 2015/16 playing season. Participants Schools with onsite medical provision were eligible to participate in this trial. 31 schools (intervention, 17 schools, 1,325 players; control, 14 schools, 1,127 players) completed the trial. Interventions Both programmes were completed for 15–20 minutes prior to main sessions, with team coaches acting as delivery agents. The intervention programme combined progressive proprioceptive, resistance, and plyometric activities. The standardised programme combined dynamic stretching, wrestling-based and speed-based activities. Main Outcome Measures Trial-arm comparisons were made across summary measures of time-loss (>24 hours) injuries, with effects analysed through magnitude-based inference against thresholds for the smallest worthwhile effects (RR=0.90 & 1.11). Results 441 time-loss injuries (intervention, 233; control, 208) were reported across 15,953 match exposure-hours (intervention, 9,083 hours; control, 6,870 hours). Intention-to-treat analyses revealed a 15% reduction in overall match injury incidence favouring the intervention (relative risk=0.85, 90% CI 0.61–1.17, unclear effect), whilst reductions were also identified in match concussion incidence (RR=0.71, 0.48–1.05, likely beneficial effect). Per-protocol analyses revealed that completing the intervention programme compared with the control programme an average of 2x/week was associated with a further reduction in overall match injury incidence (RR=0.73, 0.45–1.20, unclear effect), whilst an average use of 3x/week halved overall match injury incidence (RR=0.50, 0.22–1.13, likely beneficial effect). Conclusions This study presents encouraging evidence that using a preventive exercise programme 2–3x/week prior to training and matches can reduce injury risk in youth rugby when compared with a standardised programme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hislop et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Youth rugby injuries (n=2,452). Movement control exercise programme vs. Standardised exercise programme was evaluated on Overall match injury incidence (time-loss >24 hours) (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.61-1.17 (90% CI)). A pre-activity movement control exercise programme reduced overall match injury incidence by 15% compared with a standardised programme in youth rugby players (RR 0.85; 90% CI 0.61-1.17).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: