Why the study?
Does regular exercise affect the risk of thrombosis in the general population and elite athletes?
Does regular exercise affect the risk of thrombosis in the general population and elite athletes?
This review highlights the complex relationship between exercise and thrombosis, noting potential benefits in some populations but also identifying unique risk factors in elite athletes.
Inconsistent exercise-thrombosis data leave net risk unresolved; hypothesis-generating for tailored prevention trials in athletes and patients.
Thrombophilia refers to the increased tendency to form blood clots (thrombosis), which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Thrombosis is associated with various chronic conditions such as cancer, diabetes, renal disorders, and cardiovascular disease. The incidence and associated complications of thrombosis are likely to increase significantly in the next few decades because of aging populations. Regular exercise has been proposed to decrease the risk of developing thrombosis, although there are inconsistent data from studies investigating its effects, with reports of both increased and decreased thrombotic risk across a variety of subject cohorts. Confounders such as age, gender, hormonal variations, physical activity, underlying disease and treatment, and body composition also contribute to the difficulty in assessing and defining the precise effects of exercise in preventing thrombotic events. However, there is evidence suggesting that physical activity is beneficial for reducing thrombotic risk in younger individuals and those with chronic conditions. This article aims to summarize the known risk factors for thrombosis and briefly review the benefits of exercise in the general population. Furthermore, this article highlights the additional factors in a cohort of individuals that would (at first) appear unlikely to be at risk of thrombosis--elite athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: