Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This contribution highlights the need and benefits of a mixed methodological approach in intersectional studies of symbolic representation. Existing research concerning symbolic representation among traditionally marginalized groups such as women, racial and ethnic minorities focuses on the role either gender or race/ethnic identity plays in shaping symbolic forms of representation such as communication or presentation of self. However, extant literature tells us very little about the experiences of elected officials who are both women and racial and/or ethnic minorities, which are substantively different from those of either Anglo women or minority men. We will first argue for the benefits of an intersectional approach to studying symbolic representation in the U.S. that uses both quantitative and qualitative methods. Through the use of quantitative and qualitative content analysis in our own work, we were able to offer a more nuanced picture of how identity informs symbolic representation. As scholars with very different methodological training and different identities, we will detail the ways in which the practice of working together expanded our own understanding of how to identify and measure symbolic representation among diverse members of Congress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: