Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Context: In the last decade, machine learning (ML) components have become more and more present in contemporary software systems. A number of secondary literature studies reports challenges impacting on the development of ML-based systems, including those for requirements engineering (RE) activities. Motivation/Problem: Synthesizing secondary literature contributes to building knowledge and reaching conclusions about the existing RE approaches for ML-based systems (RE4ML), besides the novelty of a tertiary study on that subject. Objective: Through a tertiary study protocol we elaborated on, this paper synthesizes the body of evidence present in secondary studies on RE4ML systems. Method: We followed well-accepted guidelines about tertiary study protocols, including automatic search, the snowballing technique, selection and quality criteria, and data extraction and synthesis. Results: Nine secondary studies on RE4ML systems were aligned to our tertiary study's goal. We extracted and summarized the requirements elicitation, analysis, specification, validation, and management techniques for ML-based systems as well as the great challenges identified. Finally, we contribute with a nine-item research agenda to direct current and future searches to fill the gaps found. Conclusions: We conclude that RE has not been left aside in ML research, however, there are still challenges to be overcome, such as dealing with non-functional requirements, collaboration between stakeholders, and research in an industrial environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martins et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: