Key result
A four-factor risk score predicts abnormal preoperative chest radiographs with a ~0.74 C-statistic.
Why the study?
Guideline recommendations for preoperative chest radiographs vary to the extent that individual patient benefit is unclear.
Can a risk prediction score accurately identify adult patients at higher risk of abnormal preoperative chest radiographs before elective non-cardiothoracic surgery?
Observational (n=1,114)
Yes
Can a risk prediction score accurately identify adult patients at higher risk of abnormal preoperative chest radiographs before elective non-cardiothoracic surgery?
Effect estimate: C-statistic 0.739 (95% CI 0.691-0.786)
A novel four-factor risk prediction score (age, pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, diabetes) showed good discrimination for identifying abnormal preoperative chest radiographs, potentially optimizing resource utilization in elective non-cardiothoracic surgery.
May aid selective preoperative imaging; external validation leaves open whether adoption improves outcomes or efficiency.
BACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations for preoperative chest radiographs vary to the extent that individual patient benefit is unclear. We developed and validated a prediction score for abnormal preoperative chest radiographs in adult patients undergoing elective non-cardiothoracic surgery. METHODS: Our prospective observational study recruited 703 adult patients who underwent elective non-cardiothoracic surgery at Ramathibodi Hospital. We developed a risk prediction score for abnormal preoperative chest radiographs with external validation using data from 411 patients recruited from Thammasat University Hospital. The discriminative performance was assessed by receiver operating curve analysis. In addition, we assessed the contribution of abnormal chest radiographs to perioperative management. RESULTS: Abnormal preoperative chest radiographs were found in 19.5% of the 703 patients. Age, pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, and diabetes were significant factors. The model showed good performance with a C-statistics of 0.739 (95% CI, 0.691-0.786). We classified patients into four groups based on risk scores. The posttest probabilities in the intermediate-, intermediate-high-, and high-risk groups were 33.2%, 59.8%, and 75.7%, respectively. The model fitted well with the external validation data with a C statistic of 0.731 (95% CI, 0.674-0.789). One (0.4%) abnormal chest radiograph from the low-risk group and three (2.4%) abnormal chest radiographs from the intermediate-to-high-risk group had a major impact on perioperative management. CONCLUSIONS: Four predictors including age, pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, and diabetes were associated with abnormal preoperative chest radiographs. Our risk score demonstrated good performance and may help identify patients at higher risk of chest abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seangleulur et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Elective non-cardiothoracic surgery (n=1,114). Risk prediction score (age, pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, diabetes) was evaluated on Discriminative performance for abnormal preoperative chest radiographs (C-statistic 0.739, 95% CI 0.691-0.786). A risk prediction score using age, pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, and diabetes predicted abnormal preoperative chest radiographs with a C-statistic of 0.739 (95% CI 0.691-0.786).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: