Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigations that analyze the time an operating system takes to schedule, interrupt and "context-switch" to another process or job have helped developers produce highly optimized and tuned operating systems that can provide more than 99% sustained processor use for most uniprocessor applications. However, when these operating systems are installed on CPUs that are interconnected with a low-latency (user-space) communication mechanism, large variances typically occur in the time it takes to send a point-to-point message. In this article, we examine how to reduce the difference between worst-case and average-case message latency that can contribute to variance in fine-grain parallel programs. Changing how the operating system handles interrupt processing and scheduling can greatly reduce the difference between these latencies, thus increasing a program's performance.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ronald Mraz (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: