Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To compare the sensitivity to change of two HIV-health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires – the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS-HIV) and Multidimensional Quality of Life (MQOL-HIV) for use in clinical research. Methods A sample of 296 HIV-infected patients starting or switching antiretroviral treatment were randomly assigned either the MOS-HIV or MQOL-HIV questionnaires at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Ceiling and floor effects were evaluated. Sensitivity to change was assessed by comparing the percentage of dimensions with statistically significant pre–post-treatment changes and the effect sizes in those groups of patients who reported improvement and no change in self-report questions (overall, physical, mental and social health status) and clinical characteristics (number of opportunistic infections, number of symptoms, viral load level and CD4+ count). Results Ceiling effects were found in HRQoL scores at baseline and after 3 months of treatment in Pain (42.3-41.6%), Role Function (73.1–77.6%) and Social Function (60.9–63%) on MOS-HIV subscales, and in Social Support (38.2–37.6%) and Partner Intimacy (38.2–33.7%) on MQOL-HIV. For patients who improved in self-reported and objective clinical indicators of health status, mean percentage of dimensions with statistically significant pre–post-treatment changes was 86.4% on MOS-HIV and 50% on MQOL-HIV, where mean standardized effect size was 0.45 on MOS-HIV and 0.33 on MQOL-HIV for the total of dimensions. Conclusions Based on sensitivity to change the results suggest that for 3 months both questionnaires can be used, but the MOS-HIV is more sensitive than the MQOL-HIV for use in clinical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badı́a et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: