Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To examine changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), this 2-year follow-up study reassessed the HRQOL of transgender and gender expansive (TG/GE) young people enrolled in a patient registry at the Gender Wellness Center (GWC) in upstate New York. Methods: Registry patients had to have a gender-affirming care follow-up visit at the GWC within a 2 year window (+6 months) of their baseline survey to complete follow-up. Youth <18 years of age completed the Child Health Questionnaire-Child Form 87 (CHQ-CF87); youth >18 years of age completed the Short Form-36v2 (SF-36v2). We analyzed change from baseline to follow-up for 11 CHQ-CF87 subscales and 8 SF-36v2 subscales. We compared follow-up HRQOL results to U.S. population standards. We abstracted receipt of gender-affirming care from GWC electronic medical records. Results: Among the 173 patients who completed HRQOL assessments at baseline, 108 completed follow-up (62% response rate) from May 2019 to March 2022. The mean age for those completing the CHQ-CF87 was 14.6±2.2 years (range 10-17) and for the SF-36v2 was 19.7±2.3 years (range 18-24). CHQ-CF87 Behavior and Role/Social Physical Functioning subscale scores improved significantly among youth 8-17 years of age from baseline. Follow-up SF-36v2 scores for patients 18-24 years of age did not change significantly. Follow-up HRQOL mental health scores remained statistically significantly lower than U.S. population standards for both age groups. Conclusions: Two year follow-up HRQOL data from TG/GE youth receiving gender-affirming care improved in two domains, but did not change among young adults (>18 years of age). Mental health remains suboptimal compared to national standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gadomski et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: