Why the study?
Does a non-invasive pre-procedural CRT-roadmap integrating ECGI, CTA, and DE-CMR help guide LV lead placement to a coronary vein in late-activated myocardium remote from scar in CRT candidates?
Observational (n=16)
Does a non-invasive pre-procedural CRT-roadmap integrating ECGI, CTA, and DE-CMR help guide LV lead placement to a coronary vein in late-activated myocardium remote from scar in CRT candidates?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A non-invasive pre-implantation CRT-roadmap integrating ECGI, CTA, and DE-CMR is feasible for guiding LV lead placement to optimal coronary veins outside of scar tissue.
AIMS: An appropriate left ventricular (LV) lead position is a pre-requisite for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and is highly patient-specific. The purpose of this study was to develop a non-invasive pre-procedural CRT-roadmap to guide LV lead placement to a coronary vein in late-activated myocardium remote from scar. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen CRT candidates were prospectively included. Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR) were integrated into a 3D cardiac model (CRT-roadmap) using anatomic landmarks from CTA and DE-CMR. Electrocardiographic imaging was performed using 184 electrodes and a CT-based heart-torso geometry. Coronary venous anatomy was visualized using a designated CTA protocol. Focal scar was assessed from DE-CMR. Cardiac resynchronization therapy-roadmaps were constructed for all 16 patients [left bundle branch block: n = 6; intraventricular conduction disturbance: n = 8; narrow-QRS (ablate and pace strategy); n = 1; right bundle branch block: n = 1]. The number of coronary veins ranged between 3 and 4 per patient. The CRT-roadmaps showed no (n = 5), 1 (n = 6), or 2 (n = 5) veins per patient located outside scar in late-activated myocardium [≥50% QRS duration (QRSd)]. Final LV lead position was outside scar in late-activated myocardium in 11 out of 14 implanted patients, while a LV lead in scar was unavoidable in the remaining three patients. CONCLUSION: A non-invasive pre-implantation CRT-roadmap was feasible to develop in a case series by integration of coronary venous anatomy, myocardial-scar localization, and epicardial electrical activation patterns, anticipating on clinically relevant features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyên et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates (n=16). Non-invasive pre-procedural CRT-roadmap was evaluated on Final LV lead position outside scar in late-activated myocardium.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: