Key result
Nearly half of surveyed patients incorrectly believe aspirin is routinely indicated for primary prevention.
Why the study?
Appropriate use of aspirin for cardiovascular disease prevention depends on patient understanding of its risks, benefits, and indications, particularly where it is available over the counter.
Does patient understanding of cardiovascular risk and the indications for low-dose aspirin in CVD prevention differ between primary and secondary prevention settings, and how does aspirin access vary between the US and Europe?
Cross-Sectional (n=300)
Yes
Does patient understanding of cardiovascular risk and the indications for low-dose aspirin in CVD prevention differ between primary and secondary prevention settings, and how does aspirin access vary between the US and Europe?
Absolute Event Rate: 62% vs 47%
p-value: p=0.048
Patients have poor insight into their objective cardiovascular risk and misunderstand the indications for aspirin in primary versus secondary prevention, highlighting the need for better education, especially where aspirin is available over-the-counter.
Patient misconceptions on aspirin indications may drive misuse; leaves open whether education improves appropriate use amid OTC access differences.
Background Aspirin is widely administered to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, appropriate use of aspirin depends on patient understanding of its risks, benefits, and indications, especially where aspirin is available over the counter (OTC). Methods and Results We did a survey of patient‐reported 10‐year cardiovascular risk; aspirin therapy status; form of aspirin access (OTC versus prescription); and knowledge of the risks, benefits, and role of aspirin in CVD prevention. Consecutive adults aged ≥50 years with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor attending outpatient clinics in America and Europe were recruited. We also systematically reviewed national policies regulating access to low‐dose aspirin for CVD prevention. At each site, 150 responses were obtained (300 total). Mean±SD age was 65±10 years, 40% were women, and 41% were secondary prevention patients. More than half of the participants at both sites did not know (1) their own level of 10‐year CVD risk, (2) the expected magnitude of reduction in CVD risk with aspirin, or (3) aspirin’s bleeding risks. Only 62% of all participants reported that aspirin was routinely indicated for secondary prevention, whereas 47% believed it was routinely indicated for primary prevention ( P =0.048). In America, 83.5% participants obtained aspirin OTC compared with 2.5% in Europe ( P <0.001). Finally, our review of European national policies found only 2 countries where low‐dose aspirin was available OTC. Conclusions Many patients have poor insight into their objectively calculated 10‐year cardiovascular risk and do not know the risks, benefits, and role of aspirin in CVD prevention. Aspirin is mainly obtained OTC in America in contrast to Europe, where most countries restrict access to low‐dose aspirin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobsen et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease prevention (n=300). Secondary prevention scenario vs. Primary prevention scenario was evaluated on Belief that routine use of aspirin is guideline recommended for cardiovascular disease prevention (p=0.048). In a transatlantic survey, 62% of patients reported that aspirin is routinely indicated for secondary prevention, while 47% incorrectly believed it is indicated for primary prevention (P=0.048).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: