Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Brock and Wartman explore what shared decision making in patient care for physicians when a seemingly competent patient makes apparently choices. They describe a standard of rational decision making and taxonomy of the different sources and forms of irrational decision making. taxonomy includes a bias toward the present and near future, the belief "it won't happen to me, " fear of pain or of the medical experience, ' wants or values that make no sense, framing effects in the way that are presented, and conflicts between individual and social. Brock and Wartman argue that while it is often appropriate for to attempt to persuade competent patients to reconsider irrational, these choices must be respected if the patient cannot be persuaded to them. (KIE abstract)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dan W. Brock
Boston University
Steven A. Wartman
American Academy of Family Physicians
New England Journal of Medicine
Brown University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brock et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a204cacf8fff11fb92ed408 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199005313222209
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: