PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In 1985-1989, erythropoietin (EPO), its receptor (EPOR), and janus kinase 2 were cloned; established to be essential for definitive erythropoiesis; and initially intensely studied. Recently, new impetus, tools, and model systems have emerged to re-examine EPO/EPOR actions, and are addressed in this review. Impetus includes indications that EPO affects significantly more than standard erythroblast survival pathways, the development of novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, increasing evidence for EPO/EPOR cytoprotection of ischemically injured tissues, and potential EPO-mediated worsening of tumorigenesis. RECENT FINDINGS: New findings are reviewed in four functional contexts: (pro)erythroblast survival mechanisms, new candidate EPO/EPOR effects on erythroid cell development and new EPOR responses, EPOR downmodulation and trafficking, and novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. SUMMARY: As Current Opinion, this monograph seeks to summarize, and provoke, new EPO/EPOR action concepts. Specific problems addressed include: beyond (and before) BCL-XL, what key survival factors are deployed in early-stage proerythroblasts? Are distinct EPO/EPOR signals transduced in stage-selective fashions? Is erythroblast proliferation also modulated by EPO/EPOR signals? What functions are subserved by new noncanonical EPO/EPOR response factors (e.g. podocalyxin like-1, tribbles 3, reactive oxygen species, and nuclear factor kappa B)? What key regulators mediate EPOR inhibition and trafficking? And for emerging erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, to what extent do activities parallel EPOs (or differ in advantageous, potentially complicating ways, or both)?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wojchowski et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: