Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows enhanced checkpoint recruitment in yeast via DNA damage-induced phosphorylation, suggesting a rapid response mechanism.
The cell cycle checkpoint kinase Mec1 ATR and its integral partner Ddc2 ATRIP are vital for the DNA damage and replication stress response. Mec1-Ddc2 ‘senses’ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) by being recruited to the ssDNA binding Replication Protein A (RPA) via Ddc2. In this study, we show that a DNA-damage induced phosphorylation circuit modulates checkpoint recruitment and function. We demonstrate that Ddc2-RPA interactions modulate the association between RPA and ssDNA and that Rfa1-phosphorylation aids in the further recruitment of Mec1-Ddc2. We also uncover an underappreciated role for Ddc2 phosphorylation that enhances its recruitment to RPA-ssDNA that is important for the DNA damage checkpoint in yeast. The crystal structure of a phosphorylated Ddc2 peptide in complex with its RPA interaction domain provides molecular details of how checkpoint recruitment is enhanced, which involves Zn 2+ . Using electron microscopy and structural modelling approaches, we propose that Mec1-Ddc2 complexes can form higher order assemblies with RPA when Ddc2 is phosphorylated. Together, our results provide insight into Mec1 recruitment and suggest that formation of supramolecular complexes of RPA and Mec1-Ddc2, modulated by phosphorylation, would allow for rapid clustering of damage foci to promote checkpoint signalling. Graphical Abstract Highlights Rfa1-S178 phosphorylation promotes Ddc2 recruitment and Ddc2-RPA complexes modulate RPA-ssDNA behaviour. Ddc2 phosphorylation enhances Mec1-Ddc2 recruitment and is important for the DNA damage checkpoint in yeast. Structure of a Ddc2:RPA complex shows phosphorylation-dependent higher order assemblies stabilised by Zn 2+ . We propose a Mec1-Ddc2 recruitment strategy that allows fast accumulation of Mec1-Ddc2 through DNA damage-induced phosphorylation and promotes autophosphorylation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yates et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: