Why the study?
Does the assessment of additional hemodynamic indexes (brachial pulse pressure, pulse pressure amplification, early wave reflections, and pulse wave velocity) improve the prediction of cardiovascular risk in normotensive and hypertensive subjects compared to systolic and diastolic blood pressure alone?
Population
Populations of normotensive and hypertensive subjects
Comparison
Assessment of additional hemodynamic indexes… vs Assessment of systolic and diastolic blood…
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Supports incorporating pulsatile hemodynamics into CV risk models; leaves open whether routine assessment improves outcomes beyond standard BP.
Does the assessment of additional hemodynamic indexes (brachial pulse pressure, pulse pressure amplification, early wave reflections, and pulse wave velocity) improve the prediction of cardiovascular risk in normotensive and hypertensive subjects compared to systolic and diastolic blood pressure alone?
Additional hemodynamic indexes originating from pulsatile pressure should be considered alongside systolic and diastolic blood pressure to better predict cardiovascular risk.
Safar et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: