Explores how unwritten norms affect behavior and effectiveness in the Senate, implying complex social dynamics.
The Senate of the United States, we are told, is a “club.” The image, while hopelessly imprecise and occasionally quite misleading, does have at least one advantage: it underscores the fact that there are unwritten but generally accepted and informally enforced norms of conduct in the chamber. These folkways influence the behavior of senators to a degree and in directions not yet fully understood. “There is great pressure for conformity in the Senate,” one member (mercifully varying the simile) has recently said. “It's just like living in a small town.” And, as in small-town life, so too in the Senate there are occasional careers to be made out of deliberate nonconformity, sometimes only skin-deep, but sometimes quite thorough-going.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donald R. Matthews (1959) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: