Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theorising the relationship between music and affect is nothing new; scholars have long engaged the ways music expresses and influences emotions and bodily intensities. Why is it, then, that (ethno)musicologists now find themselves following rather than leading a theoretical debate that adopts so many concepts we have used for generations: intensity, embodiment, performance, resonance? This Special Issue will draw on (ethno)musicological literature that anticipated the contemporary resurgence of affect theory, and also call for an intervention in which fine-grained, ethnographically informed analysis can newly invigorate theories about the inbetweenness and intensity of encounter. The interpositions we propose centre on three ethnomusicological concepts that complicate, nuance, and refine affect theory: interpretation, resonance, and embodiment. The introduction will explicate these theoretical propositions, and the following articles will ground those concepts in fieldwork and musical particulars. The broad-ranging articles will discuss electronic dance music in Berlin, nineteenth-century operatic voices in the USA, tambura music in the USA, and musical experiences of grief. These studies will investigate and critique both affect theory and ethnomusicological methods and analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graber et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: