Key result
Real-time fMRI neurofeedback did not improve 3-month smoking abstinence rates compared to sham neurofeedback, though specific baseline default mode network connectivity patterns were associated with relapse.
Why the study?
The study aimed to explore the potential of default mode network functional connectivity for predicting smoking cessation success during real-time functional MRI neurofeedback-supported therapy.
Does baseline default mode network functional connectivity predict smoking cessation success in tobacco-dependent patients undergoing real-time fMRI neurofeedback-assisted therapy?
RCT (n=54)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does baseline default mode network functional connectivity predict smoking cessation success in tobacco-dependent patients undergoing real-time fMRI neurofeedback-assisted therapy?
In tobacco-dependent patients, widespread intrinsic default mode network connectivity during early withdrawal may serve as an early neuroimaging biomarker for predicting smoking relapse.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Real-time fMRI neurofeedback does not improve smoking abstinence; supports further study of baseline default mode network connectivity as relapse predictor.
The aim of this study was to explore the potential of default mode network (DMN) functional connectivity for predicting the success of smoking cessation in patients with tobacco dependence in the context of a real-time function al MRI (RT-fMRI) neurofeedback (NF) supported therapy.Fifty-four tobacco-dependent patients underwent three RT-fMRI-NF sessions including resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) runs over a period of 4 weeks during professionally assisted smoking cessation. Patients were randomized into two groups that performed either active NF of an addiction-related brain region or sham NF. After preprocessing, the RSFC baseline data were statistically evaluated using seed-based ROI (SBA) approaches taking into account the smoking status of patients after 3 months (abstinence/relapse).The results of the real study group showed a widespread functional connectivity in the relapse subgroup (n = 10) exceeding the DMN template and mainly low correlations and anticorrelations in the within-seed analysis. In contrast, the connectivity pattern of the abstinence subgroup (n = 8) primarily contained the core DMN in the seed-to-whole-brain analysis and a left lateralized correlation pattern in the within-seed analysis. Calculated Multi-Subject Dictionary Learning (MSDL) matrices showed anticorrelations between DMN regions and salience regions in the abstinence group. Concerning the sham group, results of the relapse subgroup (n = 4) and the abstinence subgroup (n = 6) showed similar trends only in the within-seed analysis.In the setting of a RT-fMRI-NF-assisted therapy, a widespread intrinsic DMN connectivity and a low negative coupling between the DMN and the salience network (SN) in patients with tobacco dependency during early withdrawal may be useful as an early indicator of later therapy nonresponse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paolini et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Tobacco dependence (n=54). Real-time fMRI neurofeedback vs. Sham neurofeedback was evaluated on Abstinence rate at 3 months (p=0.637). Real-time fMRI neurofeedback did not improve 3-month smoking abstinence rates compared to sham neurofeedback, though specific baseline default mode network connectivity patterns were associated with relapse.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: