Key result
A noncontact vital sign monitoring algorithm using 60-GHz FMCW radar achieved a root mean square error of 6.16 bpm for heart rate and 2.09 rpm for respiratory rate in 10 subjects.
A novel 60-GHz FMCW radar-based algorithm with adaptive sinc filtering provides accurate noncontact monitoring of heart and respiratory rates, robust to minor body movements.
In this letter, we propose a noncontact vital sign monitoring algorithm based on 60-GHz frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar. At the heart of the algorithm is a bank of sinc filters covering the heart and respiratory frequencies of an healthy adult. The filter bank is adapted, in successive iterations, to the specific cardiorespiratory frequencies of the monitored subject. The adaptability of the algorithm ensures an accurate estimate of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) for a subject sitting in front of the radar at a distance between 0.3 to 1.1 m while being robust to minor body movements and harmonics. The efficiency of the solution is demonstrated on an experimental dataset including recordings of ten subjects, where we obtain an root mean square error (RMSE) of 6.16 bpm for HR and 2.09 rpm for RR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hazra et al. (2023) studied Healthy adults (n=10). Noncontact vital sign monitoring algorithm based on 60-GHz FMCW radar was evaluated on Heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) estimation accuracy (RMSE). A noncontact vital sign monitoring algorithm using 60-GHz FMCW radar achieved a root mean square error of 6.16 bpm for heart rate and 2.09 rpm for respiratory rate in 10 subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: