Why the study?
Do the State Anxiety Inventory and Depression Questionnaire-Reduced Form accurately identify anxiety and depression in patients with pulmonary, cardiac, or neurological disease undergoing in-hospital rehabilitation?
Do the State Anxiety Inventory and Depression Questionnaire-Reduced Form accurately identify anxiety and depression in patients with pulmonary, cardiac, or neurological disease undergoing in-hospital rehabilitation?
The State Anxiety Inventory and Depression Questionnaire-Reduced Form, using specific cutoff scores, are valid tools for early screening of anxiety and depression during in-hospital rehabilitation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gender-specific cutoffs may support screening in rehabilitation patients; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
BACKGROUND: A postacute phase needs reliable routine screening instruments in order to identify the patients to be referred for a clinical interview with a psychologist. The aim of this study was to estimate the clinical cutoff scores of the anxiety and depression questionnaires and their clinical validity using a gold standard. METHODS: The study involved 177 patients with pulmonary, cardiac, or neurological disease undergoing in-hospital rehabilitation. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the best concordance between questionnaire's scores and the gold standards. The receiver operating characteristic curve for anxiety indicated that the best area under the curve for State Anxiety Inventory is obtained with a cutoff point of 21 for males and 25 for females; for depression scores, the highest area under the curve for Depression Questionnaire-Reduced Form is obtained with a cutoff point of six for males and eight for females. CONCLUSION: Using appropriate cutoff values, the State Anxiety Inventory and Depression Questionnaire-Reduced Form allow psychologists to optimize early clinical intervention strategies selecting patients with significant needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertolotti et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: